Hobby Lobby Wins


by Jason Smathers on June 30, 2014

HobbyLobbyStowOhioUS Supreme court says the HHS contraceptive mandate substantially burdens the exercise of religion and that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act applies to companies such as Hobby Lobby.
Download the court decision.

Download the PDF file .

Image copyright DangApricot, used under creative commons license.


Indiana State CapitolDefining marriage as a union between one man and one woman violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause according to today’s ruling from Judge Richard L Young of the U.S. District Court Southern District of Indiana.

The court addressed Indiana’s law which states “Only a female may marry a male. Only a male may marry a female.” Further, Indiana does not recognize marriages that do not meet this requirement conducted elsewhere: “A marriage between persons of the same gender is void in Indiana even if the marriage is lawful in the place where it is solemnized.”

The ruling likens prohibitions on same-sex marriage to that of interracial marriage. Judge Young rejects the argument that same sex couples are seeking a new right and quotes another case in saying they seek “simply the same right that is currently enjoyed by heterosexual individuals: the right to make a public commitment to form an exclusive relationship and create a family with a partner with whom the person shares an intimate and sustaining emotional bond.”

Young further rejects the argument that Indiana’s marriage law serves the purpose of procreation. Indiana permits the marriage of first cousins, but only if they are over the age of 65, thus unable to procreate. Therefore, Young concludes prohibiting same sex couples the ability to marry because they cannot procreate is inconsistent with permitting cousins to marry only if they cannot procreate.

Judge Young, in his conclusion, observes that a phenomenon is spreading throughout the federal court system, forcing states to permit and acknowledge the marriage of same sex couples:

The court has never witnessed a phenomenon throughout the federal court system as is presented with this issue. In less than a year, every federal district court to consider the issue has reached the same conclusion in thoughtful and thorough opinions – laws prohibiting the celebration and recognition of same-sex marriages are unconstitutional. It is clear that the fundamental right to marry shall not be deprived to some individuals based solely on the person they choose to love. In time, Americans will look at the marriage of couples such as Plaintiffs, and refer to it simply as a marriage – not as same-sex marriage. These couples, when gender and sexual orientation are taken away, are in all respects like the family down the street. The Constitution demands that we treat them as such. Today, the “injustice that [we] had not earlier known or understood” ends.

Download the court’s ruling.

Download the PDF file .

Image by Massimo Catarinella, used under creative commons license.

{ 1 comment }

The Bible is Sufficient to Know Heaven is Real

June 10, 2014

Southern Baptists declare afterlife books and movies to be “antithetical to Scripture.” While choosing not to name any book or movie in particular, following the huge success of books and movies like Heaven is For Real, 90 Minutes in Heaven,…

Read the full article →

Ergun Caner Fails Again in Suppressing the Truth

May 14, 2014

Judge calls Ergun Caner’s claims “ludicrous” and “outlandish.” The court has ruled on Ergun Caner’s lawsuit against Jonathan Autry. Ergun Caner had filed a lawsuit against Jason Smathers (this author) and Jonathan Autry for posting video footage of Caner lying…

Read the full article →

Supreme Court: Public Prayer Affirmed

May 5, 2014

“Prayer has become part of the Nation’s heritage and tradition.” The Supreme Court has ruled that prayer at government meetings is constitutional. Their ruling is below. download the decision

Read the full article →

Ergun Caner’s Crusade Against The Truth

May 1, 2014

Jonathan Autry points out the lies of Ergun Caner and his attorney during yesterdays hearing. Ergun Caner’s lawsuit against Jonathan Autry continues to devolve. The lawsuit itself comes after Jonathan Autry exposed the lies of Ergun Caner through a series…

Read the full article →

Caner Labels His Critics “Cyber Terrorists”

April 30, 2014

“Cyber terrorist” is the term Ergun Caner’s attorney used to describe Caner’s critics. The court heard oral arguments today on Autry’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit against him for posting videos that substantiated his criticism. Jonathan Autry, represented by his…

Read the full article →

Heaven is For Real: Fact or Fiction?

April 19, 2014

We know heaven is real, but is the book and movie having that name real? Here are some helpful resources to help you answer this question. The short answer: No. These resources provide the longer answer and will address other…

Read the full article →

The Videos Ergun Caner Sued to Suppress

April 17, 2014

[Update: Read about the court ruling here] [Update 4/22/14: YouTube restored the videos after reviewing the court order.] Following the courts decision to dismiss the claims of Ergun Caner that the footage of him lying to the US Marines is…

Read the full article →

Caner Deception of US Marines Video Footage to Return

April 17, 2014

US Federal Court says posting Caner video is fair use, not copyright infringement. Footage will be online again in short order. [Update: you can now view the videos Ergun Caner sued to suppress here.] In 2010 videos showing Ergun Caner…

Read the full article →